siteName: BookNotes logo text.
  Liberal -- and proud of it*

Books, libraries, preservation, digital convergence, music, politics
Me 2/18/03:
craig at bookways dot com
Home | Stories & Pictures | Original BookNotes | Resume | Featured CD | Reading List | Feedback | Workbench

 

October 2004
Sun
Mon
Tue
Wed
Thu
Fri
Sat
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
 
Sep   Nov

xml: xml link gif

Books
Book Arts Web
BookLab II
Future of the Book
Hands On   Bookbinding Models

All Purpose
allied
Andrea's Weblog
Antipixel
blivet 2.0
Boing Boing
Cheek
Code: The Web Socket
dangerousmeta!
drat fink
dumbmonkey
environy
Ethel the Blog
follow me here...
gordon.coale
Jeff's Weblog
Medley
NewPages Weblog
plep
rebecca's pocket
Schockwellenreiter
Scripting News
Subteranean
2020 Hindsight
UBUWEB
wood s lot

Pure Politics
AMERICAblog
Atrios
Back to Iraq 3.0
Billmon
Blah3.Com
BOP
Body and Soul
CalPundit/
  Political Animal

Juan Cole
corrente
Crooks & Liars
Cursor
Daily Kos
DonkeyRISING
Gilliard's News Blog
Huffington/The Blog
Hullabaloo
Interesting Times
Jesus' General
liberal oasis
Media Transparency
Michael Bérubé
The Moderate Voice
NDOL
New Patriot
Oliver Willis
Orcinus
POAC
Raw Story
Smirking Chimp
Talking Points Memo
TBRNews
TPMCafe
This Modern World
Tomb of Horrors
James Wolcott

Intelligence
Al-Ahram Weekly
AlterNet
America Held Hostile!
American Politics Journal
The American Prospect
Asia Times
Associated Press
BBC
Boston Globe
B'Tselem
Bush Watch
BuzzFlash
CCR
CNN
CSM
Common Dreams
CounterPunch
DEBKAfile
Democratic Underground
From the Wilderness
Guardian
Google News
Secrecy News Archive
Ha'aretz
IHT
IMC-Palestine
The Independent
IndyMedia
Information Clearing House
Junction City
LA Times
Liberal Slant
mediachannel.org
Media News
Middle East Times
Mother Jones
Narco News
The Nation
New America Foundation
News Now
New York Times
Online Journal
openDemocracy
Palestine Chronicle
The Progressive
Public i
Reuters
Reuters AlterNet
SFGate
Tapped
TomPaine
truthout
Viridian
Washington Post
What Really Happened
Working For Change
ZNet

Music
All Music Guide
Blogcritics
Honky Tonk Texas
Insurgent Country
Jensen Guitars
MusicSearcher
TexasMusicGuide
trouser press
Whole Wheat Radio

Library Weblogs
Bookslut
Internet Scout
Liblog
librarian.net
L.A.C.K.
Library Blog
Library Juice
LibraryNotes
Library Stuff
LISNews
Neat New Stuff
Research Buzz
The Rogue Librarian
SEP Weblog
Shifted Librarian
---
Library Weblogs

Reference
American Memory
Book Preservation Bibliography
Librarians Index
Library Spot
Literary Calendar
Live365
Translation
VDHBS
xrefer

E-Pubs
21C magazine
archipelago
ALT-X
Ariadne
Cites & Insights
Cultivate
DigiNews
D-lib Magazine
Edge
Exquisite Corpse
First Monday
The Idler
JoDI
megapixel.net

Links
CLIR
CoOL
Digital Eyes
Digital Photography Review
KUT
LibDex
NewPages Online

Create your own Manila site in minutes. Everyone's doing it!

    Craig's BookNotes


Permanent link to archive for 10/8/04. Friday, October 8, 2004

With this guy in charge do you really want to be a Republican? 

Documented Proof of Why No American Should Vote for ANY Republican and Leave Us with a Corrupt, Anti-Democracy Congress Run by Tom DeLay a Buzzflash Editorial
Tom DeLay is a former exterminator and Vietnam draft avoider who has risen in prominence to essentially control the Congress of the United States. His official title is Majority Leader of the House of Representatives. But he is much, much more than that. This demented man, who wanted Clinton impeached because he didn't share DeLay's "Biblical world view," pretty much sets the agenda for our national legislative branch. Along with Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and Antonin Scalia, DeLay runs the American government. These guys just send George W. Bush out to read a script, shake hands and give people nicknames.

Read what Tom DeLay has to say, and then don't vote for ANY Republican.  It's the price that even the occasional "reasonable" Republican pays for being in a party that has Tom DeLay setting the national legislative agenda.

Provided by Public Affairs, Publishers of The Hammer: Tom DeLay, God, Money, and the Rise of the Republican Congress, by Lou Dubose and Jan Reid (2004)

The Quotable Tom DeLay

(...)

On the constituency of Democrats:
"Greenpeace, Queer Nation, the National Education Association."

On the political left:
"Their malignant hold over the intellectual life of this country must be exorcised, and men and women who are willing to speak the truth offer our only hope of reclaiming our culture from the grip of a hedonistic, reckless and destructive descent into nihilism."

(...)

On being asked by a federal employee to put out his cigar, because it's against the law to smoke in federal buildings:
"I am the federal government."

On Clinton's military intervention in Bosnia:<br< "The President now needs to show leadership, consistently and with great clarity, from devising an exit strategy to developing favorable rules of engagement, from defining the criteria of success to detailing the timetables of operations. We have learned the hard way in this country that muddled military missions lacking clear leadership hurt our national credibility while putting our troops in harm's way."

On shutting down the federal government during the 1995 budget conflict:
"Screw the Senate. It's time for all-out war."

(...)

On environmental protection:
"The EPA, the Gestapo of government, pure and simply has been one of the major clawhooks that the government has maintained on the backs of our constituents."

(...)

On why the U.S. became involved in the second war against Iraq:
"Because the rabid environmentalists felt it was more important to jeopardize the lives of our brave American servicemen than risk the death of a single snail darter. The greenies have led us into the crisis in the Middle East. Not only are they responsible for the huge amount of American dependence on foreign oil, but if an open war develops in the sweltering heat of the Saudi Arabian desert, the tragic result will be on their heads."

On policy toward Israel and the Middle East:
"Jesus Christ was a Jew. The Jewish people were God's chosen people. He has a covenant with them. We ought to appreciate that."

On Clinton's expressed regret of slavery in the U.S. during a trip to Africa:
"Here is a flower child with gray hair doing exactly what he did back in the sixties. He is apologizing for the actions of the U.S."

(...)

On the 2000 presidential election:
"You're going to think I'm crazy, but I didn't see this as a tie election. This is something I've been working on for 22 years. I mean, we got it. The Republicans are the majority party in this country."

(...)

On similarities between himself and George W. Bush: "He may not appreciate this, but I think we're a lot alike. We're both raised in the oil business; we've both had our successes and our failures in business; we've both had rather rowdy young lives; and we've both settled down. We're strong believers, religious guys, family guys, and we both have a little tinge of Texas arrogance." [read them all, if you have the stomach for it]

Oh, and the question in the headline goes for Bush too.

Bremer forced to deny the facts 
It ain't a pretty sight... by Joshua Micah Marshall
It ain't a pretty sight, Paul Bremer's OpEd in the Times Friday. And though it's a rough and grisly comparison, reading Bremer's column, and watching him try to gobble down his own words, I couldn't help thinking of the imagery of hostages, orange-jump-suited or not, reading out recantations or self-denunciations, on grainy film, on pain of their life.

The last couple days can't have been pleasant ones for Bremer. And the pressure to clean up his mess must have been withering. The point of Friday's column was to try to take his impolitic admissions about troop strength out of political circulation in time for Friday night's debate.

The key passage in Bremer's piece is the fourth graf ...

It's no secret that during my time in Iraq I had tactical disagreements with others, including military commanders on the ground. Such disagreements among individuals of good will happen all the time, particularly in war and postwar situations. I believe it would have been helpful to have had more troops early on to stop the looting that did so much damage to Iraq's already decrepit infrastructure. The military commanders believed we had enough American troops in Iraq and that having a larger American military presence would have been counterproductive because it would have alienated Iraqis. That was a reasonable point of view, and it may have been right. The truth is that we'll never know.

So it was a small tactical disagreement, focused on the immediate post-war period of looting. And Bremer's not even sure whether he or those he disagreed with were right.

But look at what the Washington Post says he actually said: "The single most important change -- the one thing that would have improved the situation -- would have been having more troops in Iraq at the beginning and throughout."

In the Times today, Bremer's only response seems to be: Even though I said what I said, I wasn't really saying it when I said it.

From there the column is a lockstep recitation of the full Bush Regime Change catechism. [more]

Word from the troops 
Bush's Awful Mess: I've served in Iraq, and that's why I can't vote for this president again by Andrew Borene
(...)

At that time, when I left Iraq, fully two-thirds of the Iraqi people supported our occupation of Iraq and wanted us there. Also at that time, the 1st Marine Division, the unit I'd been part of, did occupation duty in southern Iraq for four months, in what are now lawless areas where al-Sadr is. But during that four months, no Marines were killed in action. That's an important thing to note: what happened in Iraq to cause the Iraqi people to suddenly swing to--the last poll I saw said over 80 percent of the Iraqi people want the occupation forces gone tomorrow. And they see the coalition as actually creating more chaos and more insecurity in their country. For me personally, I fully supported President Bush, I fully supported the invasion of Iraq. I still support the liberation of the Iraqi people, but I came around to support John Kerry when I realized that this administration has erred time and time again. Even in the pursuit of their own end of a free Iraq, they're incompetently carrying out the plan.

(...)

I guess I used to be what they call "Republican in name only." Kind of a Ramstad Republican, you know--socially liberal and fiscally conservative. Unfortunately the issues in this election are just too big for that. [more]

Deny the facts 
Ignorance Isn't Strength by Paul Krugman
I first used the word "Orwellian" to describe the Bush team in October 2000. Even then it was obvious that George W. Bush surrounds himself with people who insist that up is down, and ignorance is strength. But the full costs of his denial of reality are only now becoming clear.

President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney have an unparalleled ability to insulate themselves from inconvenient facts. They lead a party that controls all three branches of government, and face news media that in some cases are partisan supporters, and in other cases are reluctant to state plainly that officials aren't telling the truth. They also still enjoy the residue of the faith placed in them after 9/11.

This has allowed them to engage in what Orwell called "reality control." In the world according to the Bush administration, our leaders are infallible, and their policies always succeed. If the facts don't fit that assumption, they just deny the facts.

As a political strategy, reality control has worked very well. But as a strategy for governing, it has led to predictable disaster. When leaders live in an invented reality, they do a bad job of dealing with real reality.

(...)

The point is that in the real world, as opposed to the political world, ignorance isn't strength. A leader who has the political power to pretend that he's infallible, and uses that power to avoid ever admitting mistakes, eventually makes mistakes so large that they can't be covered up. And that's what's happening to Mr. Bush. [more]

Tempest at the top by George Ochenski

The presidential and vice-presidential debates of the last week opened the eyes of millions of citizens to the harsh reality of who is running this country and why. President Bush looked and sounded anything but presidential in his debate with challenger Sen. John Kerry.

Meanwhile, the duel between Vice-President Dick Cheney and Sen. John Edwards revealed the stark contrast in their perceptions of reality--with Cheney still living in the make-believe world where Iraqis greet American "liberators" with flowers and Halliburton is just a simple company striving to do good. Voters attempting to discern truth from lies in this tempest at the top need only overlay the Bush-Cheney fiction with the grim realities of the daily news. [more]



Copyright © BookNotes 2000-2005